Journal 18 / 2022 (Museum of Applied Art. Online)
ISSN 2466-460X (Online)
ISSN 0522-8328 (Printed edition)
PDF of the printed edition 
(8.0 MB)
Editor in Chief: Biljana Joti?
Issue Editor: Slobodan Jovanovi?
Editorial Board:
Nikola uica, PhD (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade)
Maja Stankovi?, PhD (Singidunum University, Faculty of Media and Communications, Belgrade)
Vladana Putnik Prica, PhD (University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy, Belgrade)
Sla?ana Petrovi? Varagi?, MA (Art Historian, Poega)
Biljana Joti? (Museum of Applied Art, Belgrade)
Slobodan Jovanovi? (Museum of Applied Art, Belgrade)
Biljana Crvenkovi? (Museum of Applied Art, Belgrade)
Issue Editorial Assistant: Ana Samardi?
All the papers in the sections Contributions, Polemics, Critic Reviews and Reviews are peer reviewed.List of Reviewers:
Olivera Bataji? Sretenovi?, MA, ?ssociate Professor, University of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Applied Arts Department: Applied Graphics
Ljubica Vinulovi?, PhD, Research Associate, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy - Department of Art History
Vladimir ?ur?evi?, PhD, Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Physics Department of Meteorology
Ana Ere, PhD, Research Associate, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Department of Art History
Jelena Zdravkovi?, ??, Senior Lecturer, The Academy of Applied Technical Studies, Belgrade Polytechnic College
Bogdan Janjuevi?, PhD, Art Historian Conservator, Provincial Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, Novi Sad
Ivana Kronja, PhD, Senior Lecturer, The Academy of Applied Technical Studies, Belgrade Polytechnic College
Angelina Milosavljevi?, PhD, Associate Professor, Singidunum University, The Faculty of Media and Communications
Saa Mihajlov, PhD, Senior Conservator, Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments of the City of Belgrade
Bojana Popovi?, MA, Museum Advisor, Museum of Applied Art, Belgrade
Milan Prosen, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Applied Arts Department: Art History
Vladimir Simi?, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Department of Art History
Ana Sladojevi?, PhD, Independent Curator and Art and Media Theorist
Maja Stankovi?, PhD, Professor, Si ngidunum University, The Faculty of Media and Communications Department of Digital Arts
Maja Studen, PhD, Associate Professor, Universit y of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Applied Arts The Costume Department
Jelena Pavli?i? ari?, PhD, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts, University of Pritina, Kosovska Mitrovica Department of Fine Arts
Jasmina ?ubrilo, PhD, Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Department of Art History
Marko uica, PhD, Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Department of History
Nikola uica, PhD, Professor, University of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Fine Arts
Ljubica Vinulovi?, PhD, Research Associate, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy - Department of Art History
Vladimir ?ur?evi?, PhD, Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Physics Department of Meteorology
Ana Ere, PhD, Research Associate, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Department of Art History
Jelena Zdravkovi?, ??, Senior Lecturer, The Academy of Applied Technical Studies, Belgrade Polytechnic College
Bogdan Janjuevi?, PhD, Art Historian Conservator, Provincial Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments, Novi Sad
Ivana Kronja, PhD, Senior Lecturer, The Academy of Applied Technical Studies, Belgrade Polytechnic College
Angelina Milosavljevi?, PhD, Associate Professor, Singidunum University, The Faculty of Media and Communications
Saa Mihajlov, PhD, Senior Conservator, Institute for the Protection of Cultural Monuments of the City of Belgrade
Bojana Popovi?, MA, Museum Advisor, Museum of Applied Art, Belgrade
Milan Prosen, PhD, Assistant Professor, University of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Applied Arts Department: Art History
Vladimir Simi?, PhD, Associate Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Department of Art History
Ana Sladojevi?, PhD, Independent Curator and Art and Media Theorist
Maja Stankovi?, PhD, Professor, Si ngidunum University, The Faculty of Media and Communications Department of Digital Arts
Maja Studen, PhD, Associate Professor, Universit y of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Applied Arts The Costume Department
Jelena Pavli?i? ari?, PhD, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts, University of Pritina, Kosovska Mitrovica Department of Fine Arts
Jasmina ?ubrilo, PhD, Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Department of Art History
Marko uica, PhD, Professor, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Philosophy Department of History
Nikola uica, PhD, Professor, University of Arts in Belgrade, Faculty of Fine Arts
Contents of the Jouurnal 18 / 2022 (Museum of Applied Art. Online)
????????
Impressum
Impressum
???????
Contents
Contents
? ????????
About Journal
About Journal
?????? ???????
????????????? ???? ???????? ? ?????? ??? ? ????????? ??????? ???????
MEDIEVAL FEMALE RULERS AND THEIR POWER IN THE VISUAL CULTURE OF THE BALKANS
MEDIEVAL FEMALE RULERS AND THEIR POWER IN THE VISUAL CULTURE OF THE BALKANS
Abstract (original language):
???????? ?????, ????????? ????? ? ????????? ????? ?????? ? ???? ???? ?? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? ???????????? ????? ? ???? ?? ????????????; ?????? ?????????? ????????????? ? ????????, ??????? ? ?? ?????, ??? ??? ?????? ????????? ???????????. ?????? ??? ? ????? ?? ???? ???? ?? ???????? ???????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??????? ????????, ?????? ?????????, ??????? ?????? ?????????? ??????? ? ?????? ?????? ???????? ??????????????, ??? ???? ???????? ?????? ????? ?????????? ??????. ????????? ??????? ??????? ? ???????? ??????? ????? ?? ???????? ????????? ????? ? ?????????? ? ????????? ?????? ? ????????? ???????, ?????? ?? ?? ?? ??????????? ? ????????????, ??????????? ? ??????????. ???? ???????? ? ????????? ??????? ? ??????? ???????????? ????????? ????? ????? ?? ?????? ??????? ??? ???????. ??????? ? ??????? ???????????????? ????????? ?? ????? ??????? ? ?????? ?? ??????????, ????????????, ?????? ? ?????? ?????? ????????? ??????????????, ? ? ??????? ????????? ???????? ?? ??????. ????? ??????? ???? ? ????? ???????? ???? ???????? ??????? ??????? ?????? ?? ??????? ????? ????? ? ???????????? ???? ????????? ? ?????????? ??????, ??????????? ???????? ???? ? ???????? ??? ???????? ???? ????? ?????????? ???? ??? ??? ??: ?????????, ?????? ? ????????? ???, ??? ???? ???????? ????? ?? ??????? ? ?????????? ????? ???? ???????? ? ???? ???????.
Key words (original language):
???????? ??????????????, ???? ????????, ???????? ???????, ???, ???????
Summary:
Luxurious clothes, valuable jewelry, and insignia says much about how female rulers were seen at the Byzantine court and how they were represented; usually by khtetors compositions with the ruler, sometimes with children, or through other visual representations. Their power and the intensity of that power can be visually perused from the luxurious way female rulers dressed, by wearing insignia, i.e. adorning themselves with expensive jewelry, and generally from their visual representation; whereby some also bring out the importance of their motherhood aspect. Noble silks and luxurious textiles played a very important role in the secular and sacred life of Byzantine society, as they were used in ceremonies, diplomacy and state propaganda. In fact, the female rulers in the Byzantine Empire and the countries of the Byzantine cultural circle were often dressed similarly to the male rulers. Rulers and high-ranking church officials achieved their plans and goals in the field of politics, diplomacy and military through visual representation and gifts of luxury textiles. Throughout the Middle Ages and the early modern era, luxurious silk fabrics played a particularly important role in communicating wealth and the authority of power, defining the function of the body and space as an arena for displaying several types of power, such as social, religious and political, with female rulers and female khtetors playing a notable role in the Balkans and the Mediterranean area.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
MARKO FILIP PAVKOVI?
THE BRICK AS A MEDIUM OF REPRESENTATION: Count Krsto II Ori? Slaveti?ki and Residential Architecture
?????? ????? ??????????????: ???? ????? II ????? ?????????? ? ?????????????? ???????????
?????? ????? ??????????????: ???? ????? II ????? ?????????? ? ?????????????? ???????????
Abstract (original language):
Architecture, as a medium of representation, has always been one of the most expressive ways of conveying a commissioners power. A commissioner is not a person who passively accepts the architects idea, but rather actively participates in the realisation of the building they finance. The aim of this paper is to explore the commissions of Count Krsto II Ori? Slaveti?ki (17181782) in relation to residential architecture, i.e., residential architecture will be observed as a medium of personal and family representation. The paper will not list Ori?s every commission and purchase of residential buildings, nor will they be listed chronologically. Instead, each of the selected buildings, some of which are located in the countryside, with others in urban areas, will be analysed as a separate case study. We will try to identify analogies in the spatial and decorative design of the buildings and study Ori?s role in the final realisation of the buildings he had commissioned. The analogies, a result of the commissioners wishes, are revealed in the spatial organisation of the architectural complexes, the layout organisation of the interior, and in the repertoire of decorative motifs on the works of decorative arts. It is interesting to note that Ori?s son Adam (17481820), in his memoirs, described the construction and significance of several buildings covered in this paper.
Key words (original language):
Baroque, commissioners, Count Krsto II Ori? Slaveti?ki, residential architecture, Zagreb
Summary:
??????????? ??? ????? ?????????????? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ?? ????????????????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ???? ?????????. ????????? ???? ????? ???? ??????? ???????? ????? ?????????, ???? ??????? ????????? ? ??????????? ????????? ???? ?????????. ??? ???? ???? ?? ????????? ????????? ????? ????? II ?????? ??????????? (17181782) ? ???? ? ??????????????? ????????????, ??????? ?????????????? ??????????? ?? ?? ?????????? ??? ????? ????? ? ????????? ??????????????. ? ???? ?? ???? ?????????? ????? ???????? ????????? ? ???????? ????????? ???????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ?????????? ????????. ?????? ????, ????? ?? ????????? ????????, ?? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ?? ????, ? ????? ? ??????? ?????????, ??????????? ?? ??? ??????? ??????? ???????. ?????????? ?? ?????????????? ????????? ? ?????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ??? ???????? ?? ?? ???????? ???????? ????? ? ???????? ??????????? ????????? ???? ?? ?????????. ?????????, ???????? ???? ?????????, ????????? ?? ? ?????????? ???????????? ?????????????? ????????, ????????? ??????????? ?????????? ?? ? ?????????? ???????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ????????? ?????????. ????????? ?? ????????? ?? ?? ??????? ??? ???? (17481820) ? ?????? ????????? ?????? ???????? ? ?????? ???????? ????????? ????????? ? ???? ????.
??????? ????????????
????????? ????? ? ? ??????? ???????????? ????????
VARIANTS OF THE LETTER B IN SERBIAN CYRILLIC TYPEFACES
VARIANTS OF THE LETTER B IN SERBIAN CYRILLIC TYPEFACES
Abstract (original language):
??? ?? ???????? ????????? ????? ?, ?, ? ? ? ??????????????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ???????? ?????????? ?? ???????????? ????? ? ????? ????? ????? ? ?????? ??????, ? ????? ?? ???????? ??? ????? ???? ??????? ? ???????? ????????, ???? ????????? ?? ?? ??????? ?????????? ?????? ????????? ?? ????? ? ? ????????? ? ? ????????? ??????. ? ?????????? ????????? ?????????, ?????? ???????????? ?????? ?? ????????? ?????? ??????????? ??? ??????, ?? ?? ??? ??????????? ???? ??????? ?? ??????????? ?????????, ? ???? ???? ?????????? ? ???????? ?????????? ????????? ??????? ?????. ?? ?? ?? ???????? ??? ???????????, ???? ?? ???????? ????????? ??????? ???????? ? ??????? ?????? ??????????? ????????. ????????? ????????? ?????? ?? 18, 19. ? 20. ???? (?????, ?????????? ?????? ? ???????? ??????????) ???????? ?? ??????????? ?????? ???????? ? ????????? ???? ?? ?? ????????? ? ??????, ????????? ? ?????????. ???????? ?? ? ???????? ?? ?????????? ? ??????? ???????? ?????, ???? ???????????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ??????. ????????? ?????????? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ??????? ???? ?????? ????????. ???????? ?????? ????? ?????????? ????? ? ? ???????????? ??????? ??????? ??????, ? ?? ???? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ???? ???? ? ????????? ??????. ??????????? ?? ????????? ?????? ?? ?? ??????? ??????????????? ????? ????? ? ???? ?? ?????????? ?? ????????? ? ??????? ???????? ??? ?? ? ???????? ????????? ????????? ??????? ????????? ? ???????? ???????????? ?????? ???????? ????????? ???? ?? ?? ?????? ? ?????????? ???? ?????, ??? ? ? ???????????? ??????? ??????????? ??????????.
Key words (original language):
????????? ???????, ?????? ??????????, ?????? ???????????, ??????????? ?????, ????????
Summary:
The subject of this research is the examination of the origin and development of the normal and italic form of the lowercase letter ? (equivalent to the English letter b) in the Serbian typography of the newer era, whereupon the Cyrillic and Latin alphabets share their stylistic characteristics united in the same type system. It will, therefore, help us answer the question related to the desirable form of the letter ? in the Serbian language. The aim of this paper is to resolve the dilemma of whether the alternative form of the letter ? with a diagonal stroke starting on the right, which appears today only in the Serbian language, is also mandatory, i.e. whether the form located in the primary place is suitable for the Serbian language. By reviewing and analyzing printed sources of the Serbian language from the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries (books, periodicals and type catalogs), type forms present in fonts used by hand, as well as machine and photo typesetting were examined. A comparison was made with handwritten and drawn letterforms, which are the basis for type forms. Finally, digital fonts with Cyrillic letters by foreign and domestic authors were reviewed. Based on examples from the past and contemporary practice, it was concluded that both variants of the letter ? are equally acceptable in Serbian Cyrillic, and that the choice and method of application is determined by the author of the typeface, who decides whether to choose a particular variant through the localization function or rather, to offer both variants as stylistic alternates. Regarding the decisions on letter shape and stroke thickness, the recommended solutions should be sought in the examples of typefaces by domestic authors, where the parameters are the typeface style, proportions and size range, while the criteria are the recognition of individual letters and stylistic consistency.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
???? ???????
?????????????? ? ????????? ????: ?? ??????? ?????????? ??????? ???? ?????????, ???????? ???????? ????????? ? ????????
COSTUME DESIGN AND CONTEMPORARY FASHION: ?n the ?xample of the ?heatrical Costumes of Vela Nigrinova, the Leading Actress of the National Theatre in Belgrade
COSTUME DESIGN AND CONTEMPORARY FASHION: ?n the ?xample of the ?heatrical Costumes of Vela Nigrinova, the Leading Actress of the National Theatre in Belgrade
Abstract (original language):
???? ???? ?? ????? ?????? ?????????????? ? ???? ??????? ?????? XIX ? ???????? XX ???? ?? ??????? ??????? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ????????? (18621908), ?????? ??????? ? ???????? ???????? ????????? ? ????????. ????????? ????? ????? ??????????? ? ??????? ?????????????? ??? ??? (? ????? ?? ???????????? ?? ??? ?????? ? ??????? ?? ??????? XXI ????) ????????????? ?? ? ???????? ????????? ????????? ? ?? ??????? ? ????? ?????????? ? ????? ????????? ????? ?????? ???? ??????? ? ??????????????, ???? ?? ? ????????? ??????????? ????????? ???????? ?? ???????? ????????? ????????? ? ???????? ?????????? ???????. ?????? ?? ?????? ???????? ????????? ? ???????? ????????? (18821908) ??????????????? ?? ???? ??? ?? ?? ???????? ??????????? ??????? ?????? ???? ? ????????? ????????. ??? ??? ?????????? ??????? ???? ?? ?????? ???? ?????????, ?? ?????? ????????? ???????????, ?????????? ??????? ? ?????????? ?????? ?? ????????? ???????? ?????????, ? ?? ???? ??? ?? ????????????? ? ????????? ????????? ???????? ?????????? ? ??????????????, ????? ??? ?? ???????? ?? ?? ??????? ????????? ? ???????? ???? ? ????? ?? ??????????? ? ?????.
Key words (original language):
???? ?????????, ??????????????, ???? ???????, ????????? ??????, ?????????
Summary:
The subject of this paper is the relation between costume design and fashion at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th century on the example of costumes worn by Vela Nigrinova (1862 1908), the famous and leading actress of the National Theatre in Belgrade. Research of costume design in our country is rare and concentrated mostly in the field of theatre arts and precludes the specific and often two-way relation between fashion and costume design, which in some historical periods is important for understanding certain processes in creating theatre costumes. In the 19th century, the appearance of the first fashion designers and fashion houses was reflected in costume design in the form of a specific connection between haute couture and the theatres in Europe. The theatre costumes worn by Vela Nigrinova seen in this context indicate that the approach to costume design at the National Theatre in Belgrade was the same as elsewhere in the world. As an artist, Nigrinova had the power to become an example of elegance and style on stage, such as Madeleine Guimard, Marie Taglioni or Sarah Bernhardt, and perhaps inspire and impact the taste and clothing of the ladies in the audience who at that time had abandoned the last Oriental elements in clothing and replaced them with appealing European fashion.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
???? ????????
?????? ???? ?????? ???????? (19331935) ? ????????: ????????? ????????? ????????? ?. ????
THE BUILDING OF THE HOME FOR WAR INVALIDS (19331935) IN BELGRADE: The Work of Architect Dimitrije M. Leko
THE BUILDING OF THE HOME FOR WAR INVALIDS (19331935) IN BELGRADE: The Work of Architect Dimitrije M. Leko
Abstract (original language):
?????? ???? ?????? ???????? (19331935) ?????????? ????? ?? ?????????????? ????????? ?????????? ????????? ? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ????????? ? ???????? ????????? ?. ????. ???? ?? ? ??????? ??? ???????? ? ????????? ?????????? ?????? ???? ???????, ??????????? ????????? ?????????????? ?????????, ??? ???? ????? ??????????? ? ???????????? ??????? ? ?????? ???? ?????? ????????, ??? ??, ?? ???????? ??????? ??????? ????????????, ???? ???????? ? ??? ??????? ?? ?????????? ?????????????? ????? ????????, ??? ? ???? ?????????-?????????? ?????? ?????.
Key words (original language):
??????????, ???????????, ????????? ?. ????, ??? ?????? ????????, ??????????
Summary:
The building of the Home for War Invalids (19331935) represents one of the most important achievements of prominent architect and university professor of the Technical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Dimitrije M. Leko. The need to build a home for war invalids was especially relevant in the mid 1920s, and its materialisation was realised through an edifice erected in 1935 which testifies to numerous financial inconveniences that the state had encountered after World War I, but it is also a testament to the strong marginalisation of this social group carried out by the state and Yugoslav society. The first significant initiative was to build a facility that would represent a solution for accommodating the large number of impoverished war invalids, which appeared in 1928 when a competition was announced for the creation of a conceptual plan for the Home for War Invalids. This initiative was proposed by the Association of War Invalids, one of the most important organizations for the disabled in the interwar period. The building was supposed to be located on Mali Kalemegdan, on land ceded by the Municipality of the City of Belgrade. Due to an unfavourable financial situation in the state, the construction of the facility was postponed until 1933, when the location of the building was changed. The facility was to be built on one of the most important squares in Belgrade, Wilson Square (todays Savski Trg). After the competition was announced in 1933, the conceptual plan of respected architect Dimitrije M. Leko was selected. Architect Leko conceived the functional floor plan of the building which united a wide range of different units: a boarding house for children with disabilities, a guesthouse for invalids, business premises of the Association of War Invalids with a printing house, premises for representative purposes, a large number of flats, offices, shops and warehouses. The facade of this four-storey building reflected the aesthetics of modernised academicism, as well as the forthcoming monumentalism. Well-proportioned, made of purified facade surfaces and without a pronounced visual dominance, this building radiates with a certain sense of the sublime, representing the personal artistic expression of the architect. As one of the significant representative works of architecture of modernised academicism of the 1930s in Serbia, this monumental palace has enriched the capitals architecture in many ways with its harmonious and authentic composition.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
?????? ?????
??????? ????????? ? ???????? ???? ? ??????? ???? (19202020)
INFLUENCES OF JAPONISME AND JAPANESE FASHION ON SERBIAN FASHION (1920-2020)
INFLUENCES OF JAPONISME AND JAPANESE FASHION ON SERBIAN FASHION (1920-2020)
Abstract (original language):
???????? ????????? ? ???????? ????? ??????????, ???? ????????? ????? ?????? ?? ???????? ?????????? ???????? ?????? ???? ??? ????????, ???? ?????? ? ???? ????????, ??????? ?? ????????? ? ???????? ? ?????? ???????? ? ??????????? ??????? ????. ???????????, ??????? ???????? ???? ?? ?????? ???? XX ? XXI ???a ??? ???? ?? ???????????. ?????????? ??? ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ???? ????????? ??? ????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???? ? ???? ??? ???????? ????????? ?????? ????????????? ??????????? ? ?????? ??????? ?????? ? ?????????? ?????? ?????? 1920. ? 2020. ??????. ?? ????? ???? XX ???? ??????? ??????? ???? ????????? ???????? ??????? ??????? (????? ????) ? ???????????? ?????? ???????? ??????, ???????? ? ????? ??????? ???????????, ?? ????????????? ?????? ? ?????? ??????? ?????????? ??????????? ? ?????? ???????. ? ????????? ???? XXI ???? ???? ????????? ??????? ???????? ????????? ?? ?????????? ????????? ?????? ??????e?? ? ?????????? ????????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ????. ?????????? ????????? ???????? ????????? ? ??????? ????, ???????? ??????????? ??????? ????, ?? ???? ???????? ????????? ?????? ??????? ??? ?????? ??????? ???? ?? ????????? ?????, ??????????? ?????? ????????? ????? ?????? ??????????????? ????????? ????????? ???? ???????? ????.
Key words (original language):
???????? ????, ?????????, ???????? ?????????, ??????, ?????? ????
Summary:
As Japonisme in Serbian fashion of the first half of the 20th century was the result of Western fashion influences, its inception in the national fashion system can be traced in Milena Pavlovi? Barillis 1920s works as pioneering representations of westernized Japanese modern girls Modan garu. With the restoration of bilateral relations between Serbia and Japan after the Second World War, Kenzo Takadas global impact in the 1970s is revealed in An?elka Slijep?evi?s writings. At the same time, Aleksandar Joksimovi? resorted to self-orientalization by turning Romanian folk costumes in kimono-resembling forms as a response to Dior and Saint Laurents appropriations of Japan, whereas in the 1980s Ljiljana egarac designed actual kimonos. After Tokyos positioning as a global fashion capital in the 1980s and the foundation of Belgrade Fashion Week in 1996, the influence of Japanese avant-garde designers Issey Miyake, Yohji Yamamoto, and Rei Kawakubo can be identified at the end of the 20 th and the beginning of the 21 st century Serbian fashion. By analyzing the collections of contemporary Serbian fashion designers, it is noticeable how the Japanese avant-garde has encoded itself in their expression as a denouncement of tradition. The Japonisme discourse in Serbian fashion is thus completed through an insight into the most recent fashion practices. While not a dominant aesthetic and stylistic tendency in Serbian fashion, Japonisme marked it to an extent, allowing both its contextualization within Serbian fashion history and the strengthening of Serbian fashion within global fashion, welcoming further studies on the subject.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
?????? ??????????
??????? ????????????? ????????????? ? ????????? ????????
THE PROBLEM OF THE MUSEALIZATION OF RELIGIOUS AND TREASURY OBJECTS
THE PROBLEM OF THE MUSEALIZATION OF RELIGIOUS AND TREASURY OBJECTS
Abstract (original language):
? ???? ?? ??????????? ??????? ????????????? ?????????/??????????? ???????. ??????? ??? ??????a ????? ?????? ? ????????? ???????? ?? ?????????/???????? ?? ???????????/ ????????? ??? ?? ????????? ?????????? ? ???????????? ?????????? ? ?????? ?????????? ???????: ?? ?????????? ?? ????????. ??????????????? ?????? ? ?????? ?? ??? ??????? ?????????? ???????? ?? ?????? ??????????? ??????? ??? ??????? ???????? ?????????, ? ?????, ? ?????? ??? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ?????? ???????, ? ????? ??????. ?? ?? ????????????? ?? ??????? ????????? ???????????? ????? ??????????????????? ? ?????? ?? ????? ???????? ? ??????????? ???????? ??? ?????????????? ? ?????????? ?????? ???? ??????????? ????????, ???? ?? ?? ???????? ???? ?? ? ???? ???? ??????????. ??????, ?? ??????? ??????? ????????? ????????? ???????? ?? ???? ???????? ? ?????????? ????????? ???????, ??????? ????? ????????? ? ????????? ???????.
Key words (original language):
?????????????, ?????, ??????????? ????????, ???????, ?????
Summary:
This paper tries to problematize the issue of the musealization of sacral heritage starting from the assumption that an undefined and insufficiently applied theory on one hand, and an insufficiently known practice within the monastery on the other, represent two dependent albeit often completely different fields. Their further affirmation and coherent use in science would contribute to a clear and unambiguous positioning of such topics within the studies of museology, especially in the realms of the Orthodox Christian tradition. This paper shows an example how in situ musealization has its own laws which often change the optics of museology in a general sense and create new forms of a modern thesaurus.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
?? ??????? ???????? ???????, ?? ?????? ????????
?????????? ? ??????? ?????? ?????????????? ??????? ??????? ??????????? ?????????
THE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF GREEN TRANSFORMATION IN BELGRADE THEATERS COSTUME SECTORS
THE OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES OF GREEN TRANSFORMATION IN BELGRADE THEATERS COSTUME SECTORS
Abstract (original language):
? ????????? ?????????? ???????, ??? ?????????? ??????? ?? ????? ?? ?????????, ????????? ???? ?? ??????? ????? ????? ?????????? ?????? ?? ???? ????????? ?????????? ?? ???????? ????????? ????????? ????? ???? ??????? ???????? ??? ? ???? ????? ?????? ???????? ?????????? ? ????????????? ??????? ???? ??????, ??. ????????? ????????????? ???????????? ???????? ? ?????? ????????? ??? ????????? ? ??????? ?????? ???????????? ?????????? ????????. ? ???????? ????????? ???????? ?????????? ?????????? ??????? ???????? ?? ????????? ??????? ?????? ?????????????? ??????? ????????? ? ?????????? ??????? ???? ??????? ???? ?????? ? ?????????? ???????????, ??????? ???????? ???????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ? ?????????. ???????? ???????? ???????? ??????????? ????????? ? ???? ????????? (????? ??????? ???????? ?????????? ??????? ?? ??????? ??? second hand ?????? ???????) de facto ???? ??? ????????? ?????? ? ? ??????? ???????????, ??? ???? ? de jure ?????? ????????? ?? ??????? ? ????????? ??????? ????????. ???????? ?? ??? ????, ??? ???????? ?????? ?? (? ?? ?? ??) ???????? ????????? ?????????? ?????? ?????????? ????????? ?????????? ? ???? ??????? ??????? ???????? ????????? ????????, ? ?? ???? ??????? ????????? ??????????? ??????????? ? ????? ?????????? ????, ?? ???? ?????????? ?????? ? ???????? ? ?????????? ???? ???? ???????????? ? ?????? ??????????? ?????????? ????????? ????????? ?????????? ? ?????????????.
Key words (original language):
?????? ????????, ?????? ??????????????, ????????? ???????, ??????, ?????????
Summary:
Climate change as a long-term challenge imposes an obligation for individuals and institutions to face the consequences of these changes. Thus, the role of a social agent that the theater realizes relates not only to pointing out the current paradigms of the climate crisis through stage narratives, but also its overall business strategies and the organizational culture it nurtures. The theater has to redesign its production approaches and ways of doing business as elements and factors of art institutions green politics. In this regard, the various aspects and possibilities of the transformation of the process of planning and shaping costumes in modern theater systems are identified from the implementation of energy efficiency measures, to the adoption of the concept of material reuse and recycling. However, certain segments of globally advocated recommendations in this context (such as the reuse of existing costumes or second-hand procurement sources) are already part of everyday practice in the Serbian theaters, but the question arises whether those practices are grounded on green motives. With the aim of answering this question, and having in mind the relevant practical recommendations of the adaptation protocol, we examine how much (and whether) globally pleaded activities of green transformation are present in the costume sector of Belgrades city theaters.
Translated by the authors
Translated by the authors
??? ?????????
???? ??????: ???, ????????? ? ????????
JUDY CHICAGO: Needlework, Activism and Art
JUDY CHICAGO: Needlework, Activism and Art
Abstract (original language):
? ???? ?? ???? ??????????? ???? ???????? ???? ?????? (Judy Chicago) ???? ?? ???????? ?? ???????? ? ????. ? ?????? ?? ???? ??? ????, ??????????? ????????? ????? (International Honor Quilt) ? ?????? (The Dinner Party), ??? ? ?????????? ??????? ????????? ??????? ? ???????????? ????? ????? ??????? ?? ?????? ????? ???? (Dior). ? ??????, ?????? ?? ????????????? ???? ???????? ???????????? ?????????, ?????? ??????? ??? ? ??????? ???? ?? ??????? ?? ?????? ?????????? ???? ?? ??????????, ???????? ??? ???????? ?????????. ?????? ?? ?????????? ????????????? ???????? ????? (Griselda Pollock) ? ?????? ?????? (Rozsika Parker) ? ??????????? ? ????????? ? ????????????? ???? ??? ?????????? ????????? ???? ?????? ?? ??????? ? ??????? ? ?????? ?????????, ???? ?????????? ?? ??????? ?????? ?????? ??? ????????? ????????? ? ?????????, ? ???? ?? ???? ???????? ????? ?? ???? ?????? ??????? ??? ??? ???????? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????????, ?????????? ? ?????????? ??????.
Key words (original language):
???????? ????????, ???, ??????, ???????????? ????????, ???? ??????
Summary:
Judy Chicago is a famous feminist artist from the United States of America. Chicago has frequently used artistic media that have historically been categorized as that of a lesser value compared to the works belonging to the category called fine arts. Two feminist authors, Griselda Pollock and Rozsika Parker, exposed the existing hierarchy of arts in art history in their seminal book Old Mistresses: Women, Art, and Ideology. The two authors wrote about the ways in which embroidery, quilts, and needlework have often been regarded as works belonging to the domain of crafts or applied arts because of their connections to the spheres of the home and their authors, who were in most cases, women. Feminist artists have used textile in their pieces in different subversive ways in order to show their political message, while using artistic disciplines that have often been left unacknowledged in art history. This paper looks at the ways in which Chicago used needlework in her works The Dinner Party and International Honor Quilt. It also looks at a piece called The Feminine Divine which was commissioned by Dior and based on Chicagos previous pieces and feminist activism.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
?????? ???????
FATTORIA DI CELLE GORI: ?????? ?????????? ???????-?????????? ?????????
FATTORIA DI CELLE GORI: Contribution to the Study of Site-specific Art
FATTORIA DI CELLE GORI: Contribution to the Study of Site-specific Art
Abstract (original language):
????????? ?????? ??????????????? ?? ???????? (site-specific art) ???????????? ?? ?????? ???????? ???????? ??? ??????????? ??????????? ??????? ?????????: ??????, ??????, ????????, ?????? ?????????, ???????? ??????????, ???????????? ?????????????? ? ??????. ?????? ?????????? ? ????? ???????????? ?????? 20. ???? ??? ????????? ?????? ????????? ?? ????? ?? ?????????????? ????????? ???????? ???????? ?????????: ????? ???????? ??????????. ?????????? ????????????? ???????????? ?? ?? ????????? ???? ?????????, ???????? ??????????????? ?? ???????? ????????? ?? ??????? ????? ????????? ??????????? ? ??????????? ????. ????????????? ????????? ?????? ????????? ???? (Gori), ???? ?? ??????? ???? ????, ???????? ?? ?? ???? ? ????????? ??????? ????? 20. ????, ?????????? ? ?????????? ???????-?????????? ?????????. ???? ?????-???????????, ??????? ???????, ???????? 80 ???? ???????-?????????? ????????? ???? ?????? ?? ????????????? ????? ????????? ??????? ?????????. ?????? ? ????????? ?????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ??????, ?? ???????? ? ????????? ???????? ? ????????, ????????? ?? ??? ????????? ???????? ????????? ?????? ???? ??, ? ???? ????????, ???? ??????? ???? ????. ??????????????? ???????? ??????????????? ?? ?? ??? ??????? ???? (Richard Serra) ? ?????? ???????? (Dani Karavan). ?????????? ?????? ????????? ? ?????????????? ??????????????? ?? ?? ??????? ?????? (Robert Morris) ? ???????? ?????? (Daniel Buren), ? ???????????? ?????????????? ???????????? ????, ???? ??, ?????????????, ????????? ? ???? ????? ??????? (George Trakas). ????????????? ????????????????? ?????, ???????? ???????? ?????? ? ?????? ????? ???????? ? ????? ????????? ? ?????????? ????????? ????????? ?? ???????????? ?????????? ? ??????????? ????? ???????-??????????. ? ????????? ?? ?????????? ????? ?????????? ???? ?????? ???????? ??????????? ? ???????????, ??? ???????? ???? ???????????? ????????? ?????????, ???? ?? ???????? ? ??????????? ??????? ??? ???? ????.
Key words (original language):
?????????? ???, ??????????? ????????, ??????? ? ???????????, site-specific art, Fattoria di Celle Gori
Summary:
The uniqueness of the art collection Gori of the villa Celle, which is the subject of this work, is important for an insight into the artistic thinking of the late XX century and the study of site-specific art. The works of art in this collection encourage the viewer to specify the focus and examine the process which each artist had created respecting the ethics of the work in nature. The specificity of the garden of the villa, Gambinis Garden, articulated all the art of the collection, turning it into an interactive situation. In various artistic responses to the spatial framework of Gambinis Garden, three basic approaches stand out: spatial rationalization, examination of natural-artificial relations and, an open critique of the artificiality of the idea of an ideal, romantic, landscape in the modern world we live in. As part of a rational approach, Robert Morris and Dani Karavan adapt their artistic concept completely to the spatial framework. On the other hand, Richard Serra and Daniel Buren deal with the relationship between the perception of the observer and the artistic object of architectural form and proportion. Although the place of realization of the object for these artists is in the role of the spatial rule and the unchangeable parameter in the process of artistic work, it is still in the background in relation to the artists intention. Finally, George Trakas reveals the artificiality of Gambinis idealized landscape, which is separate from all the tensions of both the industrial world and the modern moment. A critical reading of the artistic heritage of the Gori villa refers at the same time to the art object, then to the landscape within which the art object is placed as a lens of observation, and the impression of the space that the observer goes through via the interaction with the art object. Thus, the artistic practice characteristic of the location is related to the intrusion into the real space and as such, the real space with its geographical, historical, cultural and other characteristics is the basis for the experience of the work of art.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
?????? ???????
?????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???????
EXPANSION OF THE ARCHIPELAGO OF DECOLONIAL EXHIBITIONS
EXPANSION OF THE ARCHIPELAGO OF DECOLONIAL EXHIBITIONS
Abstract (original language):
????????????? ???? ? ?????????? ??????? ?????????? ?? ?????????? ?????????? ?????????????, ??????????????? ? ??????????? ???????. ?????? ?? ?? ????? ?????????? / ?????????????, ??????????? ??????????? ????? ??????? ??????a ??????a (douard Glissant). ? ??????? ??????? ???? ?? ????????? ???????? ?? ????????? ??????? ???????????? ??????? ???????? (ngritude), ?? ??????????????? ????????? ?????????? ?? ?????? ????????? ??????????? ?????? ?????????? ????. ???????? ?? ? ???? ???????? ?????? ?????????? ?????????? ???????? ? ???????? ???????? ??????? ????????? ?????????. ??????? ????? ?????? ???????? ? ?????? ? ????????? ????? ?? 1989. ??????????? ?? ?? ??? ????????, ? ????? ??????? ??????? ?? ?? ????????? ?????? ???? ???????? ????????????? ???????. ?????? ?????? ?? ??????????? ???????? ? ???????? ?? ??????? ??????? ? ??????? ???????? ? ?????????? ???????? ???????? ?? ?? ????? ??????: ???????? ??????? ????? ???????? ? ???? ???? ???? (Sonia Boyce) ? ???????????? ????? ? ???? ????? ?? (Simone Leigh). ???????????? ?????????????? ????? ? ????????? ??? ??????? ? ???????????, ? ????, ????????? ???????, ? ?????? ?? ????????????? ???????????? ???????, ??????? ?? ????????? ????????? ? ?????? ???? ?????- ??? (Ivan Muiz-Reed). ???????? ?? ???????????? ???? ?? ????? ? ?? ????????? ??????? ???? ?? ???????????? ??? ?????????????? ?? ????????????? ????, ???? ????? ?????? ?????? ?????????? ?????????????? ???????, ??? ? ??????? ??????.
Key words (original language):
??????????????, ??????????????, ???????? ???????, ?????????????, ????????????
Summary:
The decolonial turn in social sciences induced in the first decade of this century by a group of Latin American sociologists, semiologists, anthropologists and literary critics and historized under the name Modernity / Coloniality had a significant influence on the interpretation of the ways in which non-Western artists were becoming included into curated exhibitions of contemporary art. Some exhibitions, such as The Third Havana Biennial and Les magiciens de la Terre, both from 1989, were reinterpreted on those grounds, and through monographic publicans inaugurated as groundbreaking for the understanding of todays curatorial practices. On the other hand, artistic practices increasingly include decolonial approaches, and both Golden Lions at this years Venice Biennale (for the best national pavilion and the best artist in the central exhibition) were awarded for works of such kind, i. e. for celebrating black female voices in the work of Sonia Boyce, and for the creolization of form in the work of Simone Leigh. Nevertheless, the historization of the decolonial turn in art is still being generated from fragments, and the first topological attempt, quite in line with the methodology of nonsystematic trends in decolonial writing, was conducted by art historian and curator Ivan Muiz-Reed. Starting from the premises that he came forward with and from the curated exhibitions he has stressed as paradigmatic for the decolonial turn, this text maps the outlines of the archipelago of decolonial exhibitions, as well as its expansion.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
???????? ?. ????????
?????? ???????????????? ????? ? ??????????? ?? ?????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ??????????
THE INFLUENCE OF EXPERIMENTAL FILM AND PHOTOGRAPHY ON AVANT-GARDE MOVEMENTS IN MODERN ARCHITECTURE
THE INFLUENCE OF EXPERIMENTAL FILM AND PHOTOGRAPHY ON AVANT-GARDE MOVEMENTS IN MODERN ARCHITECTURE
Abstract (original language):
? ???? ???? ?????????? ?? ?????????? ?????? ??????????? ????? ? ??????????? ? ?????? ?? ??????????? ? ??????? ????????????? ?????????? ?????? ? ??????? XX ????. ?????????? ? ?????? ??????????? ????? ? ???????? ??????? ?????????, ????????? ?? ???? ?? ???????????????? ? ????????????? ?????????? ???? ???? ?? ? ??? ??????? ??????? ????? ?????? ???? ????. ?? ??? ???????????? ?????? ????????? ??????? ?????????? ????? ? ????????? ??????????? ????? ? ??????????? ? ??????? ??????? ?? ????? ????????? ??????. ?????? ?? ?????????? ?? ?? ????? ????? ? ??????????? ?????? ????? ??????????? ????? ???? ?? ?? ??????? ?? ?????????????? ????????? ?????????? ???????? ????, ??? ??? ?? ??? ????????????? ??????? ? ??????????? ?????? ????? ?? ????????? ????????????, ?????????????? ? ????????????????? ????????? ??????.
Key words (original language):
?????????, a??????????, ???????, ????, ???????????
Summary:
In this paper, we will try to define the influence of avant - garde film and photography in relation to the production of architecture and the features of architectural avant - garde practice from the beginning of the XX century. Achievements within avant-garde film in the history of film art have produced some of the most authentic and successful works of art that can be found in that period of film development. From this statement we can conclude the importance of understanding the concept and art of avant-garde film and photography and their impact on other artistic practices. There was a tendency to create a universal language through film and photography based on the fundamental aesthetic principles of the modern age, just as all modernist movements in architecture shared the aspiration to create a universal, cosmopolitan and progressive aesthetic language. Aesthetic ideas that fragment and analyze the form, made it possible to examine the way in which the content was expressed in the architecture of the modern movement. The created conditions enabled the development of new program ideas, the definition of views, the transmission of light into the object, the relationship between light and shadow, formed a new field of work. Exploring new geometric possibilities, in order to create an architecture that strives for the ideal of existential space, was an inspiring means of work. Certainly, photography and experimental film have made a significant impact in the context of avant-garde ideas in architecture. Perceiving space in this way represents a change in the experience of architecture, a change in the experience brought by modernism. Moving images change perceptions and experiences and place architecture in a reflection of a fragmented modern way of life.
Translated by the author
Translated by the author
??????? ???????????? ??????????
?????? ???????
?????????? ???
ACQUISITIONS MAA
ACQUISITIONS MAA
????????? ??????